4 provides a way of thinking that can help people determine whether reports are being produced to provide mere compliance or whether they are being used to develop/evolve corporations to higher levels of sustainability. The triple bottom line (TBL), which consists of the three Ps: People, Planet, and Profit, suggests that businesses should consider social matters, environmental concerns, and profits to maintain economic sustainability. Google Scholar. In terms of their social performance, units of measurement range from the percentage of women in the workforce to the turnover rate of employees. What are the boundaries for corporations in terms of what they choose to measure? Before discussing this limitation in detail, the advent of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and their guidelines needs to be discussed to uncover how the framework has tried to overcome this limitation. . The social measurement that can be introduced is to monitor the number of underage drinking violations, and other accidents related to alcohol, both before and after the implementation of the Committee. Hence, all forty corporations provide evidence that corporations do not see the need to provide summaries that bring different parts of information to provide a coherent picture, as they are all uniform in their approach in terms of providing a summary or discussion of the TBL results in their sustainability reports without a guide for future performance or initiatives. However, they meet only six of the dimensions of the DJSI criteria. 3, six out of the 40 corporations attempted to provide a link between the TBL principles in the form of environmental accounting (Komatsu Ltd., Nippon Steel Ltd.), a performance scorecard (Westpac), or providing sustainable environment management indicators (Ricoh Ltd.). Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 105110. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds. The Triple Bottom Line is a novel and unique concept, worthy of the focus it receives from scholars, practitioners and citizens interested in economic, community and environmental development. Available: http://www.grig3.org [Accessed 30/07/2009]. Our broad research question is: are there TBL shortcomings within the sustainability reports analysed that can be correlated with the weaknesses in TBL found in the research? Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. A framework for clarifying the meaning of Triple Bottom Line, Integrated, and Sustainability Assessment. Accounting Forum, 30, 121137. NAB does have a rigorous policy with their suppliers but fail to deliver the data on their procurement policies in their CSR report. The Pros And Cons Of The Triple Bottom Line. Constantly Monitor Market Conclusion History of Social Enterprises Although the social enterprise is relatively a term that has gotten momentum quite recently, it's usage can be found in one way or another throughout the past. This process is open to research that in turn offers the prospect of facilitating the integration of social, environmental and economic reporting. Triple Accounting, also known as Triple bottom line (or TBL or 3BL), is the accounting concept that does exactly that. A sustainable form of thinking is the best way to develop a systemic, effective and efficient solution. A coalition in search of organizational measures supportive of sustainability has attempted to achieve greater visibility and legitimacy (Gray 2002; Lehman 1999; Perrini and Tencati 2006). The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting. The next step is to improve TBL to accurately define and demonstrate its value as a measurement tool, and also as a means for corporations to produce meaningful sustainability reports that shows the reader a clear picture of their sustainable performance. Hence, TBL can be seen as an institution that uses its institutional powers and pressures to change corporate behaviour. The discussion of their employees in terms of human capital development, talent attraction etc. Existing research does not elaborate on the problematic issues of TBL nor is there any empirical work looking at corporation's failures upon their adoption of this framework. Enter the Triple Bottom Line. volume2,pages 91111 (2013)Cite this article. Measuring Organizational Performance: Beyond the Triple Bottom Line. The third criticism/fourth limitation found in the TBL approach is the desire to be compliant and whether TBL, as an institutionalized norm, pushes corporations to be compliant or go beyond compliance. California Management Review, 36, 90100. The Committee established the Asahi Breweries Group's Basic Philosophy for Promotion of Moderate and Responsible Drinking and Drinking Rules. For example, economic empowerment or income equality between men and women is a more outcome focused statistic that is useful for measuring social impacts arising from being a good employer. However, the findings from this paper show that a need to go beyond compliance is of the utmost importance, as only two corporations from the list of forty actually move towards the ideal of sustaining corporation from Dunphy's Phase Model. As we can see from Fig. As seen in Fig. Environmental, social and sustainability reporting and the web: best practices. The reason behind a majority of these problems is the lack of systems thinking in the TBL reporting system. GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. Strategic Communications Management, 4, 3237. Finally, the meaning behind TBL, and whether it represents a metaphor or accounting metric in the sustainability language can be explored. Sterling, S. (2005). The Triple Bottom Line, or TBL, is an economic concept. Some sectors and industries are unique, and the environmental and social performance can only be understood if a certain level of alignment to the issues and problems present in that industry context is mapped out in the guidelines of the GRI. It is a process not just because it happens over time, but rather because it involves a range of interests and a range of possible interpretations of those interests. Hence, the single objective of profit is replaced by three different objectives due to the TBL approach. Environmental and social factors are increasingly impacting the market in complex ways. There are currently three sets of indicators: core, additional and sector-specific (which could, for that sector include core and additional). TBL does not provide a systemic view of thinking. (2004). Accounting, Corporations and Society, 24, 217241. In short, normative institutional theory asserts that institutions will react to changes in the environment by initiating reforms and welcoming greater complexity. In addition, it rates its customers and suppliers. Business and Society Review, 111, 114. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as practised in Europe and American theater has been well documented with over a thousand articles while only 35 articles are dedicated to the Asia-Pacific region (ProQuest). Systems theory is the understanding that a system comprises of interrelated parts and is greater than the sum of its parts. While sustainability reporting and TBL for that matter is not related to certification that is required for the validation of a management system, TBL is a vehicle for allowing corporations to adopt a set of criteria that gets them recognition on sustainability indexes such as the DJSI. Adams, C. A. Seven out of the forty corporations in the DJSI Asia-Pacific rankings do not state any sort of certification that their product/service or corporation has obtained. An other advantage of replacing "profit" by "prosperity" is that it draws the attention away from profit being a . For example, from a financial perspective, money can be arguably used as a common unit of measurement whereby expenses can be subtracted from revenues. The DJSI, in the context of TBL as the subject of research, has not been identified in numerous literary works and hence this is the basis for adopting this dataset. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 296308. Essentially, it is an accounting framework consisting of three elements as opposed to just one in conventional accounting. Corporations like POSCO and Ricoh measure community involvement and voluntary days under their social performance. The entire discussion in this paper not only revolves around integration of the TBL principles but also for a way to encapsulate the three results into a meaningful endgame/conclusion at the end of the CSR reports. However, if the corporation takes a systemic view, then the stage of sustaining corporation is attainable. Moneva, J., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006). There are three major criticisms of TBL in this paper: TBL's measurement, TBL as a non-systemic approach, and TBL as a compliance/ranking mechanism. But beyond those, some software tools have been developed that are specifically focused on the triple . Corporational structure, which was created from the rules of efficiency in the market, now arises from the institutional codes and constraints that are put in place by states and the professions. The model was developed by John Elkington, in his 1994 book SustainAbility. It does not show how minimizing social cost increases profits or vice versa. In order to carry this out, they use the TBL approach to strengthen their case for a more publicly accepted method of exuding compliance and satisfactory behaviour in a sustainable manner. As a ratio, it provides balance but not interrelationships. Accompany that considers A triple bottom line, does not in any way produce harmful products, or even destructive products for instance, weapons, chemicals that are toxic or even batteries that contain heavy metals that can be termed as dangerous" (Giddens, 1995). 2007) have arisen to help focus the concerns of those seeking to make business more accountable, transparent and sustainable. However, no such common unit of measurement exists for the social indicator of the triple bottom line reporting system, thus making the aggregation principle that much harder to execute. Michel Coulmont, Sylvie Berthelot & Vincent Gagn, Fridolin Simon Brand, Verena Berger, Claus-Heinrich Daub, Khine Kyaw, Julio Pindado & Chabela de-la-Torre, Zeeshan Mahmood, Rehana Kouser & Md. Hence, a YES has been given to its social measurement in Q1. First of all, with the triple bottom line reporting, the business can improve the risk management through enhancing the management systems and the company can have better business planning as the risks are understood. A further avenue for research would be incorporate corporations from various sustainability indexes, and those that are listed as well as not listed. In addition, the objectivity and reliability of the values obtained through measurement is doubtful. Hence, this is a limitation in terms of trying to study the findings from an Asian context as the majority of companies are based out of one particular region. Archel, P., Fernandez, M., & Larrinaga, C. (2008). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for sustainable development. Sydney: Premiers Executive Development Program Report. ), The Triple Bottom Line: does it all add up. Firstly, TBL offers no means of prioritizing among the requirements of different stakeholder groups. Japan Tobacco gets into the DJSI by focusing heavily on the economic performance, and getting certifications from recognized industry standards. Von Kutzschenback, M., & Brown, C. (2006). In order to think beyond compliance, corporations need to think of how the definition of sustainability evolves, and also how as an organization, how the reporting evolves from TBL to a more holistic approach. In order to expand their measurement and reporting systems, corporations constantly and consistently state the different choices they have to make: whether it's in developing a reporting process that is integral to their business alone or to use external guidelines; where is the limit in terms of how much resources are used; what techniques or methods are best in terms of measurement. The DJSI has nine dimensions that it uses to rate corporations. The American Economist, 36, 37. Brisbane: School of Construction Management and Property. (1997). We seek to explore the three criticisms of the TBL approach by drawing out five questions from the criticisms and conducting a review of sustainability reports to investigate and provide answers for the questions. The short video below provides an overview of Elkington's Triple Bottom Line model and there are some additional study notes below the video. Environmental initiatives: Towards Triple Bottom Line reporting. However, the social impact through TBL requires a more interpretevist approach or a more qualitative approach in measurement. Komatsu and Nippon use environmental accounting to cover up the lack of integration among the TBL principles. These multiple objectives can cause corporations to pursue multiple objectives and thus become inefficient. The more balanced focus on the economic, the environmental and the social has provided a framework for institutions and markets around the world who want to focus indicators towards a sustainable future. An Empirical analysis of Triple Bottom-Line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. The main points for analysis are based on the three fundamental principles of TBL (economic, social, and environmental) and how the corporations reported against principles in their reporting system. Human ecology. Every single company measures each of the TBL indicators separately, but fails to tie them together at the end and makes no comment on intermediate causeeffect relations at levels above the bottom line. GRI has put out the G3 guidelines which can be applied to corporations of different sizes and locations. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. The Triple Bottom Line Defined The TBL is an accounting framework that incorporates three dimensions of performance: social, environmental and financial. London: EarthScan. This article was written by the Bizfluent team, copy edited, and fact checked through a multi-point auditing system, in efforts to ensure our readers only receive the best information. This means that the ability to quantify impacts with respect to these two components is possible. Public Relations Review, 31, 578583. In addition, the TBL approach does not necessarily address the concerns that are usually expressed by citizens who are the intended beneficiaries of strategic and project level undertakings (Ho and Taylor 2007). We want to measure the extent to which the lack of integration is present in the forty sustainability reports that are surveyed. Organizational mortality in the newspaper industries of Argentina and Ireland: an ecological approach. There are certain parameters that the companies use to measure and account triple bottom line. All corporations ranging from Asahi Breweries to Woodside Petroleum report dollar values to their economic performance and carbon dioxide equivalent emissions (CO2e) to their environmental performance. However, the weightings of each indicator vary which gives corporations leeway as to the methodology they use to get ranked on the index. Recognition that TBL reporting does not end with data collection and analysis but extends into the planning process arises from the straightforward observation that planning sustainable development is a process, not a singular event. In spite of gaining worldwide prominence, corporations like British American Tobacco and Japan Tobacco are ISO 14001 certified. Those corporations reporting and performing well on a TBL basis should enjoy increasing market-share while those businesses that resist pressure to embrace TBL are likely to suffer a loss of investor and consumer confidence over the longer term. Frameworks like AccountAbility 1000 have made progress in the area of social measurement and with the advent of the GRI, social measurement is not an illusionary goal but in fact, a realistic evolution. This is extremely difficult. The goal of becoming a sustaining corporation requires an awareness of the system. Not only financial needs, triple bottom line concept also takes environmental and social requirements into consideration. Unlike economics, where cost benefit analysis and other methods return dollar values in turn providing for simple decisions, the social indicator points to outcomes that are shared rather than accumulated (von Kutzschenback and Brown 2006). This would assist users to understand why the division has been made between principles primarily relating to content and primarily relating to quality (although many are relevant to both). Institutions and economic theory. The benefits of any social and environmental actions that a business engages in are likely to emerge over the long term. It also encourages an emphasis on making trade-offs, which may often be necessary but which should always be the last resort, not the assumed task, in sustainability assessment. The Singapore story: 19652000. All corporations across our sample of reports that we review in this study can do to embrace TBL in their reporting system is to indicate that certain areas will experience one type of impact, while other sections or areas will undergo a different issue or impact. Slider with three articles shown per slide. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 18, 123150. However, the social cost comes only from tree planting, ignoring other social activities. For example, how does one monetize the death of a worker on the job? The Organizational and Operational Boundaries of Triple Bottom Line Reporting: A Survey. Robins, F. (2006). Making donations to charities or putting in voluntary hours can be measured but how can the outcome be reported by TBL, or even towards their sustainability efforts. Ultimately, the goal of every corporation should move into this stage. In essence, sustainability is dependent upon healthy systems. (2006). While each company needs to measure indicators that directly apply to it, corporations like NAB don't mention anything about its suppliers. Epstein, M. J., & Birchard, B. Advantages & Disadvantages The bottom line consists of both good and bad points influencing a business. While the first question dealt with the integration of the TBL principles, the final question here is whether the reports have a discussion at the end that summarizes the overall performance/sustainability based on the tracking of the social/economic/environmental performance from the report. One of the key areas that they include in their sustainability report is recycling. They impact on individuals and communities differently. Economic and environmental impacts tend to subject themselves well to a positivist approach. Such research should be undertaken, because without it, the outcomes may be remote from anything that could be described as a collective interest. 29 out of the 40 companies are from Japan. Being committed to the social bottom line entails treating employees in an ethical and fair manner, as well as engaging in equitable compensation. Figure4 illustrates the Dunphy framework: Dunphy et al's work shows a pathway to a more sustaining approach. Here are some of the summarized criticisms: "The TBL is vague and for all intents and purposes, already in effect" It's easy to say "People, planet, profit", but it's hard to say what we mean by those things. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7, 169183. Firstly, corporations that wish to put on a facade of compliance and showcase themselves as embracing the sustainability movement can use any one of the current reporting systems to mask themselves from the external pressure to be more sustainable (Etzion and Ferraro 2009). They do not show that these impacts have occurred. The concept is rooted in politics and social change. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. Hawken, P., Lovins, A., & Lovins, L. (1999). Other weaknesses of TBL and sustainable reporting methods include:The belief that companies/investors must sacrifice one value over another (Profit vs. The need for research in this area has not been raised in other articles. Corporate citizenship and the communicator: communication's role in developing the triple bottom line in the new economy. TBL ideas are ingrained in various theoretical frameworks that challenge the notion of unrestricted capitalism.
Information Technology Manager